- Read the announcement
- Submit a proposal
- Deadline: 11:59 p.m. Eastern on February 14, 2020
Qualified applicants living with disabilities are encouraged to apply. Please feel free to share the information below with your network(s).
- Accessibility Inspections Specialist: https://denver.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/CCD-denver-denvergov-CSC_Jobs-Civil_service_jobs-Police_Jobs-Fire_Jobs/job/Downtown-Denver/Accessibility-Data—Inspections-Specialist—Denver-Division-of-Disability-Rights_R0024942
- ADA Project Manager II: https://denver.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/CCD-denver-denvergov-CSC_Jobs-Civil_service_jobs-Police_Jobs-Fire_Jobs/job/Downtown-Denver/ADA-Project-Manager-II—Division-of-Disability-Rights_R0026056
- ADA Architectural Access Manager: https://denver.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/CCD-denver-denvergov-CSC_Jobs-Civil_service_jobs-Police_Jobs-Fire_Jobs/job/Downtown-Denver/ADA-Architectural-Access-Manager—Division-of-Disability-Rights_R0026055
At the Boulder County Jail, incarceration means an immediate mental health evaluation, and it begins at the booking desk.
That’s because Boulder County Sheriff Joe Pelle has been a long-time proponent of providing mental health treatment as a way to keep people with mental illness from returning to jail.
“You have to decide,” he said, “what your philosophy is going to be. And if it’s warehousing (people) and security, this problem’s never going to get solved.”
Pelle has seen the need for mental health services grow exponentially since 2002.
“When I became sheriff, 13% of the inmates in our jail had an access one mental health diagnosis,” he said. “They had been diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar issues.”
Now, on some days, up to 60% of the jail population is receiving mental health services.
“We will see everything from a unique situational depression all the way up to the most severe where someone is actively psychotic or has suicidal attempts,” said Melanie Dreiling, a registered nurse and the jail’s health service administrator.
Her job is to help stabilize inmates so they can enter ongoing programs to help them normalize their lives and activities.
“A lot of our clients that come in here, this is the first time they will get treatment. This is the first time they might even get diagnosed,” said Boulder Sheriff Commander Tim Oliveira who heads the jail’s programs and support services.
“Once somebody is stabilized from an acute illness… they can progress through the jail,” Oliveira said.
Inmates can receive ongoing medications if they need them, along with one-on-one counselling as well as therapeutic support groups. These are services Oliveira said are now essential in the Boulder County facility.
“Jails are becoming these mental health institutions,” he said. “Because people don’t have anywhere else to go.”
“The longer they are with us, the better they thrive,” explained Melanie Dreiling. “We really see people go from being actively psychotic to being a healthy, normal stable person when they leave our jail.”
And just as important, and essential, in the Boulder model is the Partnership for Active Community Engagement (PACE) program for those who don’t go on to prison, but are allowed back into the community on probation.
“We’ve put the probation officer, mental health provider, community health, public health provider, a and a case manager all under one roof,” said Sheriff Joe Pelle. “So that they’re not just leaving our jail without access to medication or without access to support.”
The goal of this program is to coordinate with prosecutors, judges, and the parole system to stop recycling the same people through the criminal justice system without any hope of success.
One example is Joe Dankowski, who suffers from bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. He had been in and out of the Boulder jail for years. He said without the help he received while incarcerated and the ongoing services he gets through the pace program, he would be dead.
“I know what I need to do to have a clear mind, to get back on track,” said Dankowski. “I have a big support. I have a huge support system.”
Matt Jaekel, manager of the Boulder County PACE program, said Joe Dankowski is one of about 100 clients served annually.
“We provide people structure,” he said. “Our entire team knows who you are. You see them daily. We build relationships, but you also have the probation element that’s here to around accountability for attendance and participation.”
Joe Dankowski said he was out of control: fighting, using drugs, not taking proper medication for his condition, and being charged with felonies. He kept cycling in and out of jail. But not anymore. He said he now understands his illness, and his treatment.
“It’s remarkable,” said Jaekel. “He’s the same personality, absolutely, and he’s a person who believes in himself.”
While Jaekel acknowledges the upfront costs for the PACE program are expensive, he argues that treatment for patients like Dankowski, versus putting them in jail, is a bargain for taxpayers
“It costs more to put a person in jail and keep them there per day than it does to utilize our services,” he said.
Boulder County Sheriff Joe Pelle agrees and said he has real numbers to illustrate how the overall program benefits taxpayers. He said Boulder County tracks a target group of inmates who were continually in and out of jail before getting needed mental health services and entering the pace program.
“We’ve had a savings of about 10,000 jail bed days a year with a group of 50 or 60 people participating in that program,” he said. “It’s a lot of money.”
If you need mental health services, contact Colorado Crisis Services for confidential support: 844-493-TALK (8255) or text “TALK” to 38255.
More than a half-dozen world-class ski resorts are less than 100 miles west of Denver. The trouble is that they’re also some of the most popular — and there’s really only one road to get to them: the dreaded Interstate 70.
“In the beginning, I could leave at 6:30 [a.m.] or 7 [a.m.] and get here in one hour,” said Midhun Mohan, who has skied at Loveland Ski Area for the last eight years.
“But now, I probably have to leave at 5:30 [a.m.] on a day like this,” he said on a recent Saturday morning.
Travel time to this ski area just 60 miles west of Denver has increased by an average of 15 minutes since 2014, according to state data. On Martin Luther King Jr. Day weekend in 2019, more than 175,000 vehicles traveled this section of I-70. Travel time to Denver can reach three hours — or longer.
“Last year, when our family went skiing in Vail, it took six hours to get back on a Sunday night,” said Gov. Jared Polis.
So the Colorado Department of Transportation has partnered with three ski resorts, including Loveland Ski Area, to run round-trip buses on weekends. Because buses are more efficient than cars at moving large numbers of people on a tight, winding two-lane highway, state officials hope they’ll take enough cars off the road to alleviate some congestion.
“It was great. I think it’s the future,” said Mohan, a first-time bus rider.
But Colorado’s bus fleet, with a capacity of about 500 passengers in a weekend, isn’t big enough to have a noticeable effect on traffic just yet. And since launching in December of last year, they’re running less than half full. Bob Wilson, spokesman for the Colorado Department of Transportation, said it takes time to build up ridership.
i70-traffic7
Nathaniel Minor/CPR News
A woman steps off the Colorado Department of Transportation’s Snowstang bus at Loveland Ski Area. The department has partnered with three ski resorts to run round-trip buses on weekends.
“What we’re hoping for is for the program to expand,” Wilson said. “And the more cars, more vehicles, we can get off the roadway, the better it’s going to be. Even if it’s a small dent, it’s a dent nonetheless.”
Fares start at $25 round trip and are subsidized by resorts to keep them low.
“We’re trying to be part of the solution,” said John Sellers, marketing director at Loveland Ski Area. “Every person that gets on that bus essentially reduces a vehicle on I-70 and opens up another spot in our parking lot.”
But that price was not quite low enough for Kyle Helm of Denver.
“We did a little bit of calculation as far as like how much money we spend on gas to get up here,” he said. “And we have a dog that we take. If it weren’t for the dog, we’d probably take it.”
There is more than just gas prices to consider. Using the Internal Revenue Service’s mileage rate, which factors in things such as wear and tear, it costs about $70 to drive to Loveland and back.
But driving is deeply ingrained here, from the flexibility that cars give to the party atmosphere in resorts’ parking lots. Even at 9 a.m. on a Saturday, scores of skiers and snowboarders were sipping craft beers and smoking marijuana.
“Buses aren’t usually for me,” said Clay Briar of Golden, Colo., because cars give him space for “extracurricular activities.”
“Sitting in a bus in traffic with smelly strangers, I’m not for it,” added Emily Maynard, who was sipping a canned vodka cocktail with her friend Lauren Feathers in the back of a Subaru.
Colorado is not alone in dealing with ski traffic. The canyons outside Salt Lake City can jam up on weekends and powder days as well. One resort there began charging parking fees this season to incentivize using public transit. A resort outside Boulder, Colo., pulled back on a similar plan in 2018 after intense public pushback.
Briar and other skiers said they’d love to take a train to the mountains — those wouldn’t get stuck in bad weather and would operate outside traffic completely, they argue. But there are no active plans to build a passenger train service of any sort along I-70. One previous study of different types of trains from Denver to the Vail area estimated it could cost $10 billion to $32 billion.
So for now, skiers will have to be content to wait — either in their cars or on buses.
“I guess it’s just the price you pay to ski,” Feathers said.
At the end of last year, Kansas City, Missouri’s City Council voted unanimously to make the city’s bus system fare-free. The plan was meant to increase transportation equity in the region and was a priority of the city’s recently elected Mayor, Quinton Lucas and newly elected council member, Eric Bunch. Several cities in the U.S., including Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, and Denver have considered implementing free-transit systems, but each area has had its own internal debate about how to best offer a free service, limiting their ability to put forth formalized proposals.
The initiative in Kansas City has since sparked discussion among city officials and transit leaders across the nation around whether free transit is the solution they’ve been seeking to make public transportation a more accessible — and preferred — mode of transit. At a time when competition from ride-hailing services, bikes and scooters, and, of course, personal vehicles is increasingly threatening public transportation ridership, Kansas City’s willingness to experiment with new ideas to revamp transit service is intriguing — but will it work?
Fare-free transit certainly has its benefits
There’s no denying the potential benefits of fare-free transit, especially when considering how it could help marginalized communities move around more freely. This is certainly the hope among Kansas City lawmakers and transportation officials. In making its bus system free, the city hopes that it will be able to increase mobility overall, and thus, support equal access to jobs while also boosting economic activity in the city’s center. This is particularly important, as that anticipated increase in activity and revenue would help the city recoup the loss of ticket sales.
Research suggests that the success of fare-free transit is dependent on the size of both the city and transit agency. Several smaller cities in the U.S., including ski centers such as Vail, Colorado, currently offer fare-free transit and have experienced strong ridership growth as a result. In Europe, many cities currently operate fare-free transit systems with even greater success. For example, when the French city of Dunkirk introduced the concept of fare-free transit in 2017, it saw bus ridership increase by more than 60 percent on weekdays and more than double on weekends, with 48 percent of riders saying they now leave their cars at home. Especially as city leaders continue to face heightened pressure to reduce carbon emissions and get people out of their cars, incentives like this are promising — but for most cities, the fix isn’t as simple as making service free.
Free fares also enable another major shift in fare collection and policing fare-evasion. There are obvious operational benefits in reducing the administrative burden of farebox maintenance, cost of revenue collection, and reduced dwell time. A moral benefit exists as well. Free-fares can replace discrimination in fare-evasion enforcement; a civil rights challenge plaguing many major transit systems. Studies across various U.S. cities have shown that fare enforcement disproportionately targets minorities, and these minorities face steep penalties when they are stopped. Providing free-fares alleviates the need for fare enforcement which in turn reduces inequality in access to public transportation.
Making public transit free doesn’t necessarily make it better
Although there are case studies to support how fare-free transit can work successfully, it’s not the ultimate solution to improving ridership or service gaps. While free transit can certainly reduce barriers to access, we can’t overlook the reality that many cities are currently operating transit systems that don’t meet the needs of their citizens. Whether it’s an issue of routes not running frequently enough, or current systems not being capable of servicing people based on real-time demand, simply reducing barriers to access isn’t enough. In fact, a recent study by TransitCenter suggests most low-income bus riders see lowering fares as less important than improving the quality of the service.
Making the bus free is a great incentive to encourage people to ride more in theory. However, for many cities the desired impact of fare-free transit — increased ridership — often fails in achieving the goals of reduced congestion and greenhouse-gas emissions because ridership increases only marginally overall. Mostly people already willing to walk or ride transit take advantage; free fares do not entice those who otherwise would drive. Free transit doesn’t fix the lagging transit infrastructure required to make transit services more desirable. This in turn actually drives a larger gap between those that depend on public transit and those that do not; again, reinforcing a stigma about public transit’s viability and effectiveness.
Either way, the decision is still significant
Regardless of whether you support fare-free transit models or not, Kansas City’s initiative is impactful. The city’s decision comes at a time when a willingness to experiment with new transit ideas is necessary. The rise of more predictable and convenient services like Uber and Lyft is not a trend that will go away any time soon. Cities and transit agencies need to be willing to challenge the status quo and experiment with new, outcome-based models if they want to improve ridership, expand access, and ultimately enhance the vibrancy of their city. More than anything, it’s Kansas City’s entrepreneurial spirit that other cities should be embracing.
Implementing a fare-free bus system isn’t the only innovative approach the city has taken to revamp transportation in the region. Take a look at RideKC microtransit. The service has been incredibly successful since launching in Johnson County. In its first three months alone, the service moved 24X the number of rides that Bridj completed in the region before it folded. In a survey of RideKC users, 31 percent of respondents said that if the service weren’t available, they would have taken an Uber/Lyft, while 12 percent wouldn’t have made the trip at all.
Delivering transit alternatives like this is a viable solution to closing gaps in service and ensuring all citizens have equal access to navigate their city. While free transit can certainly be an element within a holistic transit ecosystem, it cannot be delivered at the expense of good service overall. Cities have to maintain a focus on continually bettering transportation, and part of that requires them to think creatively about how to align service with the needs of modern riders. At the end of the day, there needs to be an emphasis on outcome-based transit planning among transit officials nationwide. If that means creating fare-free services, it also means ensuring fast, reliable, and frequent transit. Kansas City has proven to be a positive example of this type of innovative thinking.
In densely populated urban areas, it’s nearly impossible to imagine not being able to easily get where you want to go. Indeed, in New York City (where this reporter lived for years), there are innumerable choices when it comes to transportation: Lyft, Uber, taxis, buses and subways, all competing to offer you a ride, wherever you please.
But in the vast landscapes of the rural West (read: the San Juans), the situation couldn’t be more different. Here, if you don’t own a car — or at the very least, have access to one — you’re sunk when it comes to reliable transportation. There is no quick, easy way between, say, Durango and Telluride, or Placerville and Grand Junction, unless you drive there yourself (or pay someone to take you). The distances are simply too great.
Yet change has arrived, and more is on the way. Over the past few years, Colorado has applied both brainpower and horsepower to the challenge of “connecting the dots” between those who live in rural places and the medical care and other services they may need outside their small community. “Bustang” — a name that conjures not only bus transportation but the state’s iconic western landscape, wild horses and its beloved Denver Broncos, all in one fell swoop — was created by CDOT and the state legislature in 2015. It’s been a big success: Over four years of operation, annual ridership has more than doubled on the state’s bus line, from 102,503 in 2015-16 to 238,252 in 2018-19. To buttress growth, new services have been added, such as additional stops on weekends, a “Rams Route” between the CSU community and Denver, and in 2018, perhaps the biggest change of all: “Bustang Outrider,” aka Son of Bustang, a service that attempts to link outlying rural communities to the Front Range, and Amtrak, Greyhound, and DIA. Last summer, dozens of representatives from rural communities — including Grand Junction, Montrose, Ridgway, Telluride and Durango — sent a letter congratulating CDOT’s transportation commissioners on Bustang’s success connecting communities not only up and down the Front Range, but “beyond the I-70 and I-25 corridor” through Bustang Outrider.
“Coloradans need travel options to get around the state, and the steady growth in Bustang ridership demonstrates that it is providing critical service,” the letter read.
In the San Juans, Bustang is operated by the Southern Colorado Community Action Agency (SoCoCAA). Matt Nesbitt, the agency’s division director for Roadrunner Transit and Bustang Outrider, believes reliable rural transportation can’t come soon enough.
“I used to work at Purgatory,” Nesbitt recalled. “No one carpools. On ‘kiddo’ days,” where the resort offered special prices for ages 7 and under, “you’d have, like, one little kid for every car, and all these parents hanging out.” Route 160, on the way north to Purgatory, from Durango, was busy twice daily no matter the snowy weather, and parking was difficult. Mass transit eases traffic congestion in mountain resorts, and Telluride has been on-board with the idea for years: the Galloping Goose and SMART buses ferry passengers around town, Down Valley and to Norwood, and the gondola offers 3 million passenger rides every year between downtown and Mountain Village.
CDOT recently announced that it will add another Bustang Outrider route, between Grand Junction and Telluride, starting early next year.
Bustang is “basically entirely paid for by federal funds,” Prilwitz said, and communities have to want the service to be there. Not every place does. The City of Alamosa reportedly pushed back against the idea of Bustang arriving, but “we received a petition with about 500 signatures” from residents of Crestone (along the Alamosa route) who did want a Bustang Outrider to provide services between the small town of Moffat and Denver. “There was a standing-room-only meeting in town hall, with a lot of Buddhist monks,” Jeffrey Prilowitz, CDOT’s Bustang Outrider manager recalled. “Many people travel to Crestone for the spiritual centers. Others live in the Baca Grande housing development outside town. They keep a car there, but wanted to be able to ride the bus into Denver for business.”
The myth persists that “only bad people ride buses. But that’s not true,” Nesibtt said. “We see all types of people on Bustang.”
Indeed, some of the results of CDOT’s surveys about bus ridership might come as a surprise: “The average income for a rider between Fort Collins and Denver is $100,000,” Prilowitz said. “We’ve had passengers who own their own planes in Aspen, but they’ll take the bus to Denver for a meeting” rather than dealing with a drive through the mountains in uncertain weather. “It’s easier and quicker,” Prilowitz said. “We see quite a few people who fly from Europe into Denver and take the bus to Gunnison. They get off at Salida, which has really marketed itself for mountain biking.
“The intent of Bustang Outrider was to help people who live in rural Colorado get medical care in Denver,” Prilowitz said. “Access to essential services is the phrase we use. People on the Front Range don’t always seem to realize just how remote parts of Colorado are. A number of people ride the bus to Denver to buy a car, and drive back home.”
On the Western Slope, Bustang’s conveyance is a bright purple, 35-foot coach from Belgium by a company called Van Hool.
“No U.S. companies built a 35-footer when we first began looking for them,” Prilowitz said. “Now the state has a sales contract with them,” and all new buses will be Van Hools. A second coach will be added next month. The bus travels from Durango seven days a week to Grand Junction and back, with stops in Mancos, Cortez, Dolores, Rico, Telluride, Placerville, Ridgway, Montrose and Delta in between. (One route it will not take — even if there is inclement weather on Lizard Head Pass — is the long way around, from Durango to Grand Junction via Red Mountain Pass. “It’s a big no-no,” Prilowitz has said, although “a passenger-less bus did take that route when it needed to get to Grand Junction for servicing.”)
There was an accident on the Durango-Grand Junction route in the past year, in a place and time one might expect: near the Alta Lakes turnoff (just down from Lizard Head Pass), in a spring snowstorm.
“A southbound big-box delivery truck was going too fast for conditions,” Prilowitz said, “and was heading straight for the bus. The driver saw it, and had the bus stopped by the time it got hit. Telluride Express, the parent company that runs the Gunnison-Denver route, put passengers up in Telluride for a few hours, got them pizza and transported them later that day to Grand Junction” (the truck driver was cited for reckless driving).
“The bus driver was the hero,” Prilowitz said. “The route’s good. There were a couple days last year where they had to cancel because of weather, but otherwise it’s good.”
In the experience of this reporter — and two comrades, who each rode Bustang Outrider on separate weekends last year — the route is definitely good. Two Saturdays ago, I boarded the bus for a trip from Ridgway to Grand Junction. The most difficult part of my journey was figuring out where to board: there’s no formal bus stop yet — signage will come soon, Prilowitz said — but the schedule and route information (posted online at ridebustang.com) advise that the pickup spot is the “Ridgway Area Chamber of Commerce/Museum” on Highway 62, so all I had to do was stand and wait for a big, black-and-blue bus to make its along Sherman Street through downtown Ridgway to pick me up.
The bus arrived right on time, at 10:25 a.m. Jay Rhodes was the driver that day, and Erma Linda Begay, who has driven for Greyhound, was along for the ride, in training to become another Bustang driver. The route between Durango and Grand Junction “is tough,” Nesbitt said, and Rhodes agreed. (“All morning we’re going uphill, through canyons where there’s no cell service and a huge variety of weather,” Nesbitt explained. “It’s freezing cold, and by the time you get up to Grand Junction, everything’s melting off. You turn around, and everything’s freezing up again, and you’re driving home in the dark. It’s hard on equipment and drivers.”)
“We probably have the longest Outrider route,” Rhodes said. Drivers find it challenging, but “kids love it,” Rhodes said, and passengers appreciate the Van Hools’ free WiFi and outlets for plug-ins, bathroom, and ample space for luggage and bicycles. Despite the abundance of wildlife along the route, Rhodes hasn’t hit any wildlife.
“I’ve seen lots of elk, deer, bear, bighorn sheep, and a white wolf outside Trout Lake,” he recounted as we rolled along. “I’ve seen dozens of bald eagles along the Dolores. They’re awesome.”
Most drivers are aware of how strenuous a route it can be, Rhodes said.
“We sit them down and explain, this is one of the longest routes Bustang has. We work a 13-14 hour day.”
The bus departs its warehouse at 5:30 a.m. for a 6:40 a.m. pickup in Durango, and arrives back in Durango at 7:10 p.m. the same evening. At present, there are four drivers working the route, and Rhodes hopes to hire another one.
“Of all the places I go, Montrose is the craziest” when it comes to drivers, he said. “Things get a little sketchy. I’ve had drivers I come up behind” who seem to deliberately slow down, and then speed up when Rhodes attempts to pass them. It’s a cat-and-mouse game that Begay said she’s also witnessed during her tenure at Greyhound, and which this reporter watched play out along the road outside Montrose.
“We all know there are people out there who will try to get you in a wreck with a bus, so they can collect money in a lawsuit,” Rhodes said (Begay nodded). That was the most stressful part of the ride (the truck eventually exited US 50). The most sublime was the scenery: canyon country as glimpsed from high above the road. (In autumn, along on the route between Rico and Telluride, the bus occasionally seems to drive so close to the aspen trees, “It’s like you’re in a forest of gold,” Nesbitt said.)
The most inspiring part of our ride was when, following a brief rest stop in Montrose, Rhodes exited in search of a passenger who’d lingered a little too long in a fast-food place, to let him know it was time to get back on the bus. It was a level of concern you never would have witnessed in an urban setting.
The moment that made you realize bus service is here to stay on the Western Slope also took place in Montrose, when Jack Johnson, a retail district manager for Target, hopped on board. Johnson lives in Grand Junction, where he keeps his car. He’d just flown in from Montrose.
“This is super-convenient,” he said of Bustang. “When I’m in Europe, I take buses quite a bit.” With that, he popped in his earphones and began checking his email, working as Rhodes began driving. And we were off.
Navigation
Our Address
Newsletter Signup
Oops! We could not locate your form.